Asset Allocation vs Diversification: Battle to the Death!
Investing is often fraught with debates over the best strategies to achieve financial goals while managing risk. Two commonly mentioned concepts, asset allocation and diversification, are often misunderstood or conflated. But which one reigns supreme, and what happens when diversification fails? Let’s dive into this epic battle.
Asset allocation is the strategy of dividing your investment portfolio among different asset classes, such as stocks, bonds, cash, and alternative investments like real estate or commodities. The primary goal is to balance risk and reward by aligning your portfolio’s composition with your financial goals, risk tolerance, and investment horizon.
Risk Management: Spreading investments across asset classes reduces exposure to a single market segment.
Customization: Tailoring the mix to fit individual financial circumstances and objectives.
Dynamic Adjustments: Rebalancing over time as market conditions or personal goals change.
For instance, a young investor might favor an aggressive allocation with more stocks, while a retiree might lean toward bonds and cash to preserve capital.
Diversification, often referred to as “not putting all your eggs in one basket,” is the practice of spreading investments within an asset class or across multiple asset classes to reduce unsystematic risk. The idea is that by holding a variety of investments, poor performance in one area can be offset by gains in another.
Reduced Volatility: A diverse portfolio is less likely to experience drastic swings.
Broader Exposure: Investments across industries, geographies, and market caps mitigate sector-specific or region-specific risks.
Systematic vs. Unsystematic Risk: While systematic risk (e.g., market downturns) affects all assets, diversification aims to eliminate unsystematic risks tied to individual investments.
For example, an investor holding shares in multiple sectors like technology, healthcare, and energy might see one sector thrive while another struggles, balancing overall performance.
While asset allocation sets the overall framework for how much you invest in each asset class, diversification fine-tunes this strategy by spreading investments within those classes. Think of asset allocation as the “big picture” and diversification as the details that fill it in.
Aspect | Asset Allocation | Diversification |
---|---|---|
Definition | Dividing portfolio across asset classes | Spreading investments within or across asset classes |
Goal | Balancing risk and reward at the macro level | Reducing risk from specific investments |
Example | 60% stocks, 30% bonds, 10% cash | Holding 20 different stocks within the 60% allocation |
Risk Focus | Reduces exposure to overall market conditions | Mitigates risks tied to specific investments |
Despite its reputation as a risk-reduction tool, diversification is not a panacea. Here are some scenarios where diversification can fail:
In times of financial crises or extreme market stress, asset classes that usually behave differently may move in the same direction. This phenomenon, known as rising correlations, undermines the protective buffer diversification is meant to provide.
Example: During the 2008 global financial crisis, both equities and real estate declined sharply, leaving diversified portfolios exposed.
Holding too many investments can dilute returns. By adding more assets, especially those with low potential for growth, investors may inadvertently drag down their portfolio’s performance.
Example: Owning shares in every company within a sector may yield similar returns as holding an index fund but with higher fees and effort.
Some investors believe they are diversified because they own many stocks, but if those stocks are concentrated in a single sector (e.g., technology) or region (e.g., the U.S.), they remain vulnerable to sector- or region-specific downturns.
Example: During the dot-com crash in 2000, portfolios heavily weighted toward tech stocks experienced significant losses, even if they were “diversified” within the sector.
Diversification cannot eliminate systematic risks—the risks that affect the entire market, such as economic recessions or geopolitical events.
Example: In March 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly all asset classes fell as panic gripped global markets.
Investors often confuse having many investments with being diversified. True diversification requires understanding correlations and ensuring exposure to genuinely uncorrelated assets.
Example: Holding multiple U.S. equity mutual funds that all track the S&P 500 is not diversification, as these funds are likely to perform identically.
The battle between asset allocation and diversification is not about choosing one over the other but understanding how they complement each other. Asset allocation provides the foundational strategy, determining how much to allocate to broad asset classes, while diversification adds nuance, ensuring the risks within those allocations are spread effectively.
However, diversification has limits, and failing to account for its pitfalls can lead to unexpected vulnerabilities. By combining sound asset allocation with informed diversification, investors can build resilient portfolios that stand a better chance of weathering market turbulence.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance.
Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The Sharpe Ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management.
Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House.
Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2020). Investments. McGraw-Hill Education.
Statman, M. (2004). The Diversification Puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal.
Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Asset allocation cannot eliminate the risk of fluctuating prices and uncertain returns. There is no guarantee that a diversified portfolio will outperform a non-diversified portfolio. No investment strategy, such as asset allocation, can guarantee a profit or protect against loss. Actual client results will vary based on investment selection, timing, market conditions, and tax situation
Click here for Cambridge’s Form CRS as well as a link to Brokercheck
-Aristotle
Having an honest, trusted, and knowledgeable advisor who can help you make smart decisions and create a path to your financial goals is the best way to secure your future and the future of those you care about.
*Source: CFF Board (cfp.net), February 3, 2022
© 2024 Drexel & Co. All rights reserved. Investment Advisory Services offered through Investment Advisor Representatives of Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser. Cambridge and Drexel and Co. Financial Planning are not affiliated. Securities offered through Registered Representatives of Cambridge Investment Research, Inc., a broker-dealer, member FINRA / SIPC, to residents of [AL, AZ, CA, IN, TN, DE, FL, GA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MS, NC, OH, PA, TX, VA, WV].
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.